[arin-ppml] [EXT] Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation

Carlos Friaças cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu May 2 16:05:55 EDT 2019


Thanks for clarifying!

I'm biased by the RIPE NCC process, where everything reverts back to 
before the agreement was signed, service-wise (as i read it). Unless the 
holder agrees to move from LEGACY to ALLOCATED status, of course.

I'll also doublecheck with RIPE NCC folks that revokation is not possible 
within their service area (if LEGACY status is kept).

Thanks & Regards,

On Thu, 2 May 2019, John Curran wrote:

>> On May 2, 2019, at 2:12 PM, Carlos Friaças via ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml at arin.net> wrote:
>> ...
>> It seems evident that a RIR can't revoke legacy space. Ever.
> Carlos -
> In the case of ARIN that would be incorrect, as ARIN has revoked legacy address space from parties that have violated registry policies.
> ARIN registry policies are applicable to all parties in the registry - those legacy holders under RSA do have specific terms and conditions (and a reduced fee schedule), but ARIN registry policies are applicable regardless and violation can have consequence.
> Thanks!
> /John
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> American Registry for Internet Numbers

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list