[arin-ppml] [EXT] Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu May 2 15:12:48 EDT 2019
On Thu, 2 May 2019, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> In message <0fc93580-db31-0505-9b1a-a5f57731fe0a at gmail.com>,
> Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why people always believe they "own" IP address space and nobody can
>> take it from them as if it was a router or a server purchased with a
>> invoice and declared in their annual balance ?
> Well, owners of so-called "legacy" IPv4 address blocks have... according
> to what I have been told... indeed tried very very hard to make that case
> that they never opted in to the present allocation system and that thus,
> they are not in any way subject to or bound by it's rules.
> That is a longstanding and thorny problem. But I believe that it is
> largely or entirely orthogonal to the changes contemplated by ARIN-prop-266.
It seems evident that a RIR can't revoke legacy space. Ever.
The RIRs have (through the years) found ways to provide services to legacy
If a legacy resource holder goes "rogue", revokation is still NOT
possible, however, the RIR might want to reconsider if it should continue
providing services to that company/party...
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML