[arin-ppml] [EXT] Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation

[Carlos Friaças]

Hi,

For me it's important to have in mind that "affected people" are not only 
legitimate resource owners that see their resources hijacked by someone, 
*but also* everyone that receives an hijacked announcement, possibly 
causing *their* packets to go towards wrong places...

Regards,
Carlos



On Thu, 2 May 2019, Fernando Frediani wrote:

> On 02/05/2019 13:38, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ARIN-PPML wrote:
>       Having specific wording will *immediately* allow courts and judicial experts, to confirm that it was against the rules of the association. Done.
> 
> Exactly ! I think that's a very import point to take in mind and focus about this discussion.
> 
> As it was already said in another message I understand the authors, if this doesn't reach consensus, are fine to either have a simpler proposal stating this clearly so future affected people can have better guarantees to scale these
> cases out of the RIR like to the court. The only thing that doesn't seem reasonable to have is nothing.
> 
> Fernando