[arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2019-15: Hijacking Authorization Not-intended

theone at uneedus.com theone at uneedus.com
Mon Jul 22 11:04:36 EDT 2019


Technically, under the existing rules, running wifi with dhcp is 
considered a violation if the DHCP pool consists of public addresses.

This statement makes it clear that it was never intended to be against 
policy.  In a day of BYOD devices, this should make things clearer.

Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019, ARIN wrote:

> The following has been revised:
> * Draft Policy ARIN-2019-15: Hijacking Authorization Not-intended
> Revised text is below and can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_15/
> You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will 
> evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft 
> policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in 
> the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:
> * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
> * Technically Sound
> * Supported by the Community
> The PDP can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/
> Regards,
> Sean Hopkins
> Policy Analyst
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> Draft Policy ARIN-2019-15: Hijacking Authorization Not-intended
> Problem Statement:
> The current text of Section 2.5 of the NRPM could be interpreted as 
> implicitly giving incidental or transient users of IPv6 address space the 
> ability to use that space without the authorization of the organization to 
> which the space is delegated. This policy makes it clear that such 
> third-party use must be authorized by the organization to which the address 
> space is delegated.
> Policy Statement:
> Present Text
> Note that the incidental or transient use of address space by third parties 
> shall not be considered a reassignment or a violation of the exclusive use 
> criterion.
> Proposed Text
> Note that the authorized incidental or transient use by third parties of 
> address space delegated to an organization shall not be considered a 
> reassignment or a violation of the exclusive use provision.
> Comments: N/A
> Timetable for implementation: Immediate
> Anything Else: The proposed text is consistent the intent expressed by 
> similar polices of other RIRs.
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list