[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-10: Inter-RIR M&A - Seeking Community Comments

Job Snijders job at ntt.net
Thu Jul 18 14:22:55 EDT 2019


On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 5:48 PM Roberts, Orin <oroberts at bell.ca> wrote:
> Well said Albert, I agree with this viewpoint, IPv6 was meant to solve the existing IPv4 operational issues; I see this policy proposal as extending them.

I cannot believe that the idea of "if you want a larger block, you'll
need to renumber everything into the new block" is receiving any form
of support. This idea strike me as actively harmful towards any form
of IPv6 deployment.

Kind regards,

Job


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list