[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-10: Inter-RIR M&A - Seeking Community Comments

[Job Snijders]

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 5:48 PM Roberts, Orin <oroberts at bell.ca> wrote:
> Well said Albert, I agree with this viewpoint, IPv6 was meant to solve the existing IPv4 operational issues; I see this policy proposal as extending them.

I cannot believe that the idea of "if you want a larger block, you'll
need to renumber everything into the new block" is receiving any form
of support. This idea strike me as actively harmful towards any form
of IPv6 deployment.

Kind regards,

Job