[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-4: Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers

Joe Provo ppml at rsuc.gweep.net
Mon Apr 8 02:42:27 EDT 2019

On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:49:42PM +0300, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 21:25 Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> > Otherwise, let???s
> > recognize the inevitable consequence of this proposal regardless of
> > advocate???s intents (which I mostly take at face value).
> You seem to blow up the scope of the proposal to impossible width. It isn???t
> about money or policies; the IPv6 transfer policy proposal originates from
> operational concerns related to the global availability of ARIN???s RPKI
> services.

Nit: the *current* formulation of the policy directly speaks 
to RPKI.  The original proposal 
( https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/proposals/2019/ARIN_prop_263_orig/
) only stated need. As a thought experiment, if the board 
decided to remove any [perceived] barriers to TAL adoption, 
would there be a new need expressed, or would this policy 
no longer be relevant? The answer might illuminate if this 
issue is best addressed within policy or not. 

IMO an M&A/reorg/restructure carve-out makes significant 
sense, similarly to other non-scarce resources.



Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling 

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list