[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-4: Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers
alyssa at alyssamoore.ca
Sun Apr 7 16:13:29 EDT 2019
I'd like to jump in to add another layer to the discussion so we have
everything on the table.
It's currently not possible to transfer IPv6 resource *intra*regionally in
ARIN. My org has been supporting a small/new internet exchange point and
part of that involved using a block of our IPv6. That IX now has the
ability to manage their own resources. Under current policy, it is not
possible for us to transfer them the v6 that is already in use.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 2:50 PM Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 21:25 Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> I am in complete agreement here. Let us not construct a policy in support
>> of IP policy forum shopping.
> Nobody has articulated why that would be a bad thing. Do you have any
> supporting data to facilitate developing an opinion one way or another?
> If we want to consolidate all the RIRs into RIPE because they have the
>> most liberal policies and lowest fees, then let’s be honest about it and do
>> it directly through proposals to consolidate the other RIRs. Otherwise,
>> let’s recognize the inevitable consequence of this proposal regardless of
>> advocate’s intents (which I mostly take at face value).
> You seem to blow up the scope of the proposal to impossible width. It
> isn’t about money or policies; the IPv6 transfer policy proposal originates
> from operational concerns related to the global availability of ARIN’s
> RPKI services.
> Kind regards,
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML