[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-4: Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers
jayb at braeburn.org
Wed Apr 3 13:26:22 EDT 2019
I agree with Chris, and I am in favor of the policy proposal as well.
I see no reason to maintain this peculiar distinction between the ipv4
and ipv6 address families. The distinction should be eliminated.
Regarding those who are concerned that this policy could lead to
fragmentation of ipv6 routing tables: I am confident that the intent
of the proposal was to transfer allocations in their entirety.
If words to that effect are needed, I'm sure they can be developed.
Christopher Morrow writes:
> This policy seems nice, it'll remove the weird (and unnecessary I
> think) distinction between address families.
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:52 PM ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
> > On 21 March 2019, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
> > "ARIN-prop-263: Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers" as a Draft
> > Policy.
> > The Draft Policy text is below and can be found at:
> > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_4/
> > You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will
> > evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft
> > policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as
> > stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these
> > principles are:
> > * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
> > * Technically Sound
> > * Supported by the Community
> > The PDP can be found at:
> > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/
> > Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> > https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/
> > Regards,
> > Sean Hopkins
> > Policy Analyst
> > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> > Draft Policy ARIN-2019-4: Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers
> > Problem Statement:
> > There is an operational need to allow RIR transfers of IPv6 resources
> > between RIRs with an equivalent transfer policy. ARIN’s RPKI Trust
> > Anchor (TA) is measurably less widely deployed than TAs from other RIRs.
> > As a consequence, RPKI ROAs published through ARIN offer less value.
> > Operators seeking to extract the most value from their investment in
> > IPv6 would benefit from the ability to transfer IPv6 resources to RIRs
> > with more widely deployed RPKI Trust Anchors.
> > Policy Statement:
> > Change the first sentence in section 8.4 from:
> > “Inter-regional transfers of IPv4 number resources and ASNs may take
> > place only via RIRs who agree to the transfer and share reciprocal,
> > compatible needs-based policies.”
> > To:
> > “Inter-regional transfers of Internet number resources may take place
> > only via RIRs who agree to the transfer and share reciprocal, compatible
> > needs-based policies.”
> > Comments:
> > Timetable for implementation: Immediate
> > _______________________________________________
> > ARIN-PPML
> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML