[arin-ppml] ARIN discontinuing DNSSEC capability to legacy holders
SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com
Fri Oct 5 11:22:08 EDT 2018
It does give us a better view and understanding of the Legacy issue which comes up here from time to time.
John the link to the Members is helpful but it doesn't answer my question if there are any /8 who have not signed LLRSA/RSA's??
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099 - Office
770.392.0076 - Fax
℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
Conquering Complex Networks℠
From: ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net> On Behalf Of hostmaster at uneedus.com
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 11:15 AM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN discontinuing DNSSEC capability to legacy holders
The member list does not help, as I understand that many legacy holders have other resources that are not legacy such as IPv6 holdings and thus are members as well. Of course if they are a member, it it hard to complain about them having legacy resources, when they are otherwise a member.
Since you have admitted that the number is trending downward, this also means the costs associated also are trending downward as well. We also know in a IPv6 only world, there are no legacy resources, but it will be a long time (if ever) before we get there.
At the current trend, how many years before the legacy costs are not even noticable on the radar? I think we spend more energy on this than it is worth, and if we reach the IPv6 goal, it is self resolving.
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, John Curran wrote:
> On 5 Oct 2018, at 7:24 AM, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com<mailto:SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com>> wrote:
> So then without telling us who, are there any /8 holders that have not signed an LSRA/RSA? What about the government /8 block holders?
> Steven -
> Government agencies are often ARIN members, and thus show up on
> ARINâ€™s membership list -
> John Curran
> President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML