[arin-ppml] ARIN discontinuing DNSSEC capability to legacy holders

Steven Ryerse SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com
Fri Oct 5 10:24:14 EDT 2018

So then without telling us who, are there any /8 holders that have not signed an LSRA/RSA?  What about the government /8 block holders?

Steven Ryerse
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA  30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099 - Office
770.392.0076 - Fax

℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
                     Conquering Complex Networks℠

-----Original Message-----
From: John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> 
Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 10:21 AM
To: Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com>
Cc: hostmaster at uneedus.com; arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN discontinuing DNSSEC capability to legacy holders

On 5 Oct 2018, at 7:00 AM, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com> wrote:
> It would be interesting to know how many of each size legacy holders that haven't signed are still out there.  What about the big holders like AT&T and others that have /8's and other large sized blocks?  Have they all signed an LSRA/RSA?  I think legacy holders want to be treated the same way (equally) - so if even one of the /8 holders hasn't signed then the /24 holders should not be forced to sign.  The /8 holders have legions of attorneys but the /24 holders don't.  

Steven - 

We don’t publicly provide contracting or invoicing information specific to individual organizations, but the total number of ARIN resources not-under-agreement (as opposed to RSA/LRSA) continues to drop and the number under agreement continue to rise; we’ll present that trend later today at the ARIN meeting. 

Note that this is indicative both of legacy resource holders coming under agreement with ARIN, but more so large legacy resources being transferred to other parties (and thus no longer being legacy number resources as they’re not held by the original registrant or their legal successor.) 


John Curran
President and CEO

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list