[arin-ppml] ARIN discontinuing DNSSEC capability to legacy holders
jcurran at arin.net
Fri Oct 5 10:21:20 EDT 2018
On 5 Oct 2018, at 7:00 AM, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com> wrote:
> It would be interesting to know how many of each size legacy holders that haven't signed are still out there. What about the big holders like AT&T and others that have /8's and other large sized blocks? Have they all signed an LSRA/RSA? I think legacy holders want to be treated the same way (equally) - so if even one of the /8 holders hasn't signed then the /24 holders should not be forced to sign. The /8 holders have legions of attorneys but the /24 holders don't.
We don’t publicly provide contracting or invoicing information specific to individual organizations, but the total number of ARIN resources not-under-agreement (as opposed to RSA/LRSA) continues to drop and the number under agreement continue to rise; we’ll present that trend later today at the ARIN meeting.
Note that this is indicative both of legacy resource holders coming under agreement with ARIN, but more so large legacy resources being transferred to other parties (and thus no longer being legacy number resources as they’re not held by the original registrant or their legal successor.)
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML