[arin-ppml] ARIN discontinuing DNSSEC capability to legacy holders

[hostmaster at uneedus.com]

The member list does not help, as I understand that many legacy holders 
have other resources that are not legacy such as IPv6 holdings and thus 
are members as well.  Of course if they are a member, it it hard to 
complain about them having legacy resources, when they are otherwise a 
member.

Since you have admitted that the number is trending downward, this also 
means the costs associated also are trending downward as well.  We also 
know in a IPv6 only world, there are no legacy resources, but it will be a 
long time (if ever) before we get there.

At the current trend, how many years before the legacy costs are not even 
noticable on the radar?  I think we spend more energy on this than it is 
worth, and if we reach the IPv6 goal, it is self resolving.

Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.



On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, John Curran wrote:

> On 5 Oct 2018, at 7:24 AM, Steven Ryerse <SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com<mailto:SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com>> wrote:
>
> So then without telling us who, are there any /8 holders that have not signed an LSRA/RSA?  What about the government /8 block holders?
>
> Steven -
>
> Government agencies are often ARIN members, and thus show up on ARIN’s membership list -  https://www.arin.net/public/memberList.xhtml
>
> FYI,
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
>
>
>