[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-9: Clarification of Initial Block Size for IPv4 ISP Transfers

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon Jan 22 18:35:50 EST 2018


Fully support the direction you are now taking this.

Owen

> On Jan 20, 2018, at 9:16 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> 
> I think the burden is the potential to have to rejustify an ISP's initial allocation when being fulfilled by transfer.  The inconsistency seems inefficient and creates confusion; there appears to be support for eliminating the inconsistency.  With slightly more support for changing section 8 to be consistent with section 4, rather than the other way around.   
> 
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com <mailto:scottleibrand at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Quoting myself:
> 
>> If there are organizations transferring blocks larger than a /24 for whom officer-attested justification is burdensome (to them or to ARIN) I’d like to understand what is burdensome, so we can figure out how to reduce that burden. If not, then implementing section 8 as written seems appropriate until we identify a reason to change it. 
> 
> 
> Do you know of any organizations transferring blocks larger than a /24 for whom officer-attested justification is burdensome (to them or to ARIN)?
> 
> Scott
> 
> -- 
> ===============================================
> David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu <mailto:Email%3Afarmer at umn.edu>
> Networking & Telecommunication Services
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota   
> 2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
> ===============================================

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20180122/c1f509e8/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list