[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-9: Clarification of Initial Block Size for IPv4 ISP Transfers

[David Farmer]

I think the burden is the potential to have to rejustify an ISP's initial
allocation when being fulfilled by transfer.  The inconsistency seems
inefficient
and creates confusion; there appears to be support for eliminating the
inconsistency.  With slightly more support for changing section 8 to be
consistent with section 4, rather than the other way around.

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Quoting myself:
>
> If there are organizations transferring blocks larger than a /24 for
> whom officer-attested justification is burdensome (to them or to ARIN) I’d
> like to understand what is burdensome, so we can figure out how to reduce
> that burden. If not, then implementing section 8 as written seems
> appropriate until we identify a reason to change it.
>
>
> Do you know of any organizations transferring blocks larger than a /24
> for whom officer-attested justification is burdensome (to them or to ARIN)?
>
> Scott
>

-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20180120/8676b769/attachment.htm>