[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-9: Clarification of Initial Block Size for IPv4 ISP Transfers
farmer at umn.edu
Sat Jan 20 12:16:52 EST 2018
I think the burden is the potential to have to rejustify an ISP's initial
allocation when being fulfilled by transfer. The inconsistency seems
and creates confusion; there appears to be support for eliminating the
inconsistency. With slightly more support for changing section 8 to be
consistent with section 4, rather than the other way around.
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com>
> Quoting myself:
> If there are organizations transferring blocks larger than a /24 for
> whom officer-attested justification is burdensome (to them or to ARIN) I’d
> like to understand what is burdensome, so we can figure out how to reduce
> that burden. If not, then implementing section 8 as written seems
> appropriate until we identify a reason to change it.
> Do you know of any organizations transferring blocks larger than a /24
> for whom officer-attested justification is burdensome (to them or to ARIN)?
David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML