[arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Improved IPv6 Registration Requirements

Dewole Ajao dewole at forum.org.ng
Sun Oct 8 09:18:33 EDT 2017

Hi Albert,

You would also have noticed that almost everyone seemed fine with "should" as a fallback position if the use of "shall" would pose a delay to general acceptance. 

If I were to guess, "should" would go through and a discussion would be started regarding how to enforce a "shall" in a reasonable manner. 

My thoughts anyway. 


Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse typos and autocorrect strangeness. 

> On 7 Oct 2017, at 4:17 PM, hostmaster at uneedus.com wrote:
> I noticed at ARIN40, that "shall" had more votes, and zero "no" votes, as compared to "should".
> Just wondering, what happens/will happen next?
> Albert Erdmann
> Network Administrator
> Paradise On Line Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list