[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-12: Require New POC Validation Upon Reassignment

Andrew Bagrin abagrin at omninet.io
Mon Nov 27 15:35:08 EST 2017


I’d also like to see a $100 monthly fee per IPv4 /24 currently assigned.



I held onto a /16 at a previous company, just because it was cool but had
no use for it.  I checked recently and it is still assigned to the same
company and not being used 15 years later.



By adding a $25k monthly fee, they would quickly return the block.



Currently we have to pay brokers or sellers to acquire more IPv4 space. I
would rather pay ARIN which could go to better funding the organization.



*From:* ARIN-PPML [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] *On Behalf Of *Austin
Murkland
*Sent:* Monday, November 27, 2017 3:26 PM
*To:* Andre Dalle <adalle at ncf.ca>
*Cc:* ARIN-PPML List <arin-ppml at arin.net>
*Subject:* Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-12: Require New POC
Validation Upon Reassignment



Also support this



On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Andre Dalle <adalle at ncf.ca> wrote:


All my IPv4 space is reassigned, and I discovered last year that not all of
it - from the same carrier - is properly associated with us.

Upstream created a POC for us (even though we were an existing customer
with multiple reassignments), and it's been sluggish getting them to
sort it out.  We have rDNS, so most abuse reporting still finds us, but
some abuse mechanisms out there rely on POC info.

So I think this is necessary.  +100 from here as well.

----
André Dalle
Systems Administrator
National Capital FreeNet [http://www.ncf.ca]


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Provo" <ppml at rsuc.gweep.net>
To: "ARIN-PPML List" <arin-ppml at arin.net>
Sent: Wednesday, 22 November, 2017 11:01:59
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-12: Require New POC
Validation Upon Reassignment

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 06:13:46PM -0500, David Huberman wrote:
> Thank you Scott.  As the co-author, I very much recognize this
> proposal text is a ???first draft???.  Working with my co-author
> Jason Schiller, and having solicited feedback from the AC, this
> proposal was submitted to solve the general problem.  My hope was
> the mechanics would be looked at critically by the community during
> the PDP, and we would work together to improve them.

With my personal hat on I'm very happy to see this getting
to discussion. +100 for intent and I look forward to useful
language suggestions here.

--
Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20171127/64e6cc33/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list