[arin-ppml] Post-ARIN-40 updates to 2017-4
farmer at umn.edu
Fri Nov 17 10:26:49 EST 2017
I support this policy as written.
The current reciprocity requirement does not recognize that the vast
majority of IPv4 transfers are out of the ARIN region and the vast majority
of the supply of IPv4 resources available for transfer exist within the
ARIN region. Finally there are legitimate operational reasons that
companies within the ARIN region need to transfer resources to themselves
or their foreign subsidiaries in other regions regardless of reciprocal
transfer policies being available.
Thank you for simplifying the text.
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Rob Seastrom <rs-lists at seastrom.com> wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
> Based on feedback received at the ARIN-40 conference, the AC Shepherds
> have updated Draft Policy 2017-4 - "Remove bidirectional requirement for
> inter-RIR transfers".
> The proposal in its entirety is below. We seek feedback and comment.
> 2017-4 - Remove bidirectional requirement for inter-RIR transfers
> Problem Statement:
> ARIN’s inter-RIR transfer policy is functionally one-way, so the assertion
> of a reciprocal two-way requirement is gratuitous.
> Policy statement:
> Add the following sentence after the first sentence of NRPM 8.4:
> Inter-RIR transfers may take place only via RIRs who agree to the transfer
> and share compatible, needs-based policies.
> Timetable for implementation: Immediate.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML