[arin-ppml] IPv4 SWIP requirements (?)

[Cj Aronson]

Scott,

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette <
> rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> In message <8A3A301D-39B5-4F81-8E2C-90E23B81919E at panix.com>,
>> David Huberman <daveid at panix.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In short, there is an argument that the SWIP rules are no-op now. So to
>> answer
>> >your question directly; what do you do? Nothing. Those days are long gone
>> >and ARIN has other focuses now.
>>
>> So, let me see if I understand this...
>>
>> ARIN doesn't, can't, and most probably won't either enforce the existing
>> (IPv4) SWIP rules, nor, for that matter, any new SWIP rules that may be
>> drafted and/or promulgated with respect to IPv6.  Is that about the size
>> of it?
>>
>
> Pretty much, unless someone comes up with a new method of enforcing SWIP
> rules.  Some of the discussions with law enforcement could eventually
> result in such carrots or sticks, but no one has proposed any specifics yet.
>

There is this draft policy that has a few "sticks" at least for delegations
to downstream ISPs.
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2017_3.html

>
>
>>
>> ----Cathy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170526/ba7fc514/attachment.htm>