[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6

Scott Leibrand scottleibrand at gmail.com
Tue Jun 6 15:24:58 EDT 2017


On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:04 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Leif Sawyer <lsawyer at gci.com> wrote:
>
>> The boundaries at /60, /56, and /48  have all been discussed.  If one is
>> more favorable than
>> the other, and you would like to see the proposal edited to use that one,
>> we will certainly
>> take that under advisory.
>>
>
> Hi Leif,
>
> IMHO, IPv6 /48 = IPv4 /24. Since we require SWIP for IPv4 /24s, we should
> require it for IPv6 /48s.
>
> I'd be comfortable with "more than a /56" and "more than a /60." I prefer
> "more than a /56."
>
> I would oppose "/60 or more" or "/56 or more" because I believe that would
> encourage ISPs to engage in unhealthy assignment practices to avoid SWIP
> reporting, such as assigning /64s, /61s and /57s.
>

+1

-Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170606/ffa52961/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list