[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6

[Brian Jones]

I would be in support of more than a /56.

—
Brian E Jones CSM, CSPO
Network Infrastructure & Services
Virginia Tech
bjones at vt.edu

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:30 PM Leif Sawyer <lsawyer at gci.com> wrote:

> Good day, PPML!
>
> First, as the primary shepherd for ARIN-2017-5,  I want to thank everybody
> for the spirited
> discussion on this proposal.  It's generated a lot of good feedback for
> the AC to take
> under consideration as we develop the text.
>
> Based on the community feedback, as well as internal dialog, I'm going to
> remove the IPv4
> requirements from the draft policy proposal.
>
> I'll have a new version of the draft text posted to the ARIN website once
> I'm finished with
> the edits and it's approved internally.
>
> It would still be very useful to understand if there's majority community
> support for
> specific nibble boundaries for the IPv6 cut-off.
>
> The boundaries at /60, /56, and /48  have all been discussed.  If one is
> more favorable than
> the other, and you would like to see the proposal edited to use that one,
> we will certainly
> take that under advisory.
>
> Thanks,
>
>   Leif Sawyer
>   ARIN  Advisory Council.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170606/46641e2f/attachment.htm>