[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6 - updated 2017-07-21
farmer at umn.edu
Mon Jul 24 17:07:39 EDT 2017
Honestly, I could live with it just those three lines. However, I'm
willing to recognize at least the possibility there is a legitimate
community interest in having records for assignments that are shorter than
As for IPv4, I'd also be just fine with those three lines. Again,
recognizing at least the possibility there is a legitimate community
interest in having records for assignments that are shorter than /24
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Tony Hain <alh-ietf at tndh.net> wrote:
> While I agree with the general direction David is heading, his text is
> still overly complex to deal with the goal. This whole thread only requires
> 3 lines:
> Reallocations MUST provide SWIP.
> Requests by the assignee MUST provide SWIP.
> Anything appearing independently in the global routing table SHOULD
> provide SWIP.
> All the rest is noise that doesn’t add to solving any problem known to
> mankind, and is simply an artifact of the IPv4-think insane conservation
> mindset. Size is irrelevant in both protocol versions, and even if you
> think it is, the only time it comes up is in #3. In any case the length of
> #3 might change over time, and there is no reason the policy text needs to
> change to track it. If something is independent, no matter what it’s length
> is, the intent is to have accurate contact info.
> Saying anything more is trying to legislate ISP behavior, which is
> explicitly outside the scope of ARIN.
David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML