[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6
lsawyer at gci.com
Mon Jul 17 18:09:01 EDT 2017
Shepherd of the draft policy chiming in.
Thanks for the lively discussion, everybody. There's certainly a lot to think about here.
Just as a reminder to folk, the current policy under question is located here:
And, to help clarify some confusion, per 126.96.36.199.1 (https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six5531)
residential customers "holding/64 and larger blocks" may use censored data, i.e. "Private Customer/Residence"
in lieu of actual names and street addresses.
With that said, I have a couple of questions to ask, based on potential rewrites that are brewing.
First: Assuming a preference for /56 (based on PPML feedback) for the moment, which is the more
preferential rewrite of the opening sentence of 188.8.131.52?
a) Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
b) Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses, or subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
Second: Given your specific choice of A or B, are you preferentially inclined to choose the provided bit-boundary, or "/48"
Third: If none of these options are palatable, do you have a proposed approach?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML