[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6
jcurran at arin.net
Wed Jul 19 21:01:42 EDT 2017
On 19 Jul 2017, at 4:36 PM, hostmaster at uneedus.com wrote:
> While thinking about it John, there was some discussion over using the main facility address in a single SWIP for an entire block that contained many sites. Is this allowed?
Alas, the only “advice” that I can provide will be based upon the adopted policy
in the NRPM and accompanying policy discussion in PPML during the policy
As best as I can discern, the intent of the current policy is to provide that
address blocks of “significant" size which are reassigned will have accurate
technical and abuse contacts, while also respecting the need for residential
privacy in the case where the street address or postal code would be allow
for personal identification.
To the extent that ISPs are attempting in good faith to follow the existing
policy regarding registration of reassignments, ARIN will consider such
efforts compliant. If the community wishes specific outcomes for particular
scenarios, then it will be necessary to provide additional policy language
which covers those cases.
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML