[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2017-5: Equalization of Assignment Registration requirements between IPv4 and IPv6

[Paul McNary]

Leif
If I understand your question:

Originally /48 to anyone was the BCP for future efficiency.
I can change my BCP to /56.
/48 is my preference, however, which is the BGP boundary.
Otherwise I have little issue with choice "b" if forced.

I would prefer to give my residential users a /48 for the future but a /56
could work, just a pain. Again rDNS could be a problem.

Do AS's use ARIN reverse DNS for size smaller than /48?
If rDNS will not work worldwide except with /48 advertising,
I think that should be the SWIP boundary.
I know for a while some AS's required /32.
I think that has finally changed.
However ARIN's assignment web page indicates we should be
SWIP'ing /29's on IPv4 by policy or risk ARIN action.

Thank you
Paul McNary
pmcnary at cameron.net


On 7/17/2017 5:09 PM, Leif Sawyer wrote:
>
> Shepherd of the draft policy chiming in.
>
> Thanks for the lively discussion, everybody.   There's certainly a lot 
> to think about here.
>
> Just as a reminder to folk, the current policy under question is 
> located here:
>
> https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six551
>
> And, to help clarify some confusion, per  6.5.5.3.1  
> (https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six5531)
>
> residential customers "holding/64 and larger blocks"   may use 
> censored data,  i.e.  "Private Customer/Residence"
>
> in lieu of actual names and street addresses.
>
> --
>
> With that said,  I have a couple of questions to ask, based on 
> potential rewrites that are brewing.
>
> First: Assuming a preference for /56  (based on PPML feedback)  for 
> the moment,   which is the more
>
> preferential rewrite of the opening sentence of 6.5.5.1?
>
> a)Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses shall 
> be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service 
> which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
>
>
> b)Each static IPv6 assignment containing a /55 or more addresses, or 
> subdelegation of any size that will be individually announced, shall 
> be registered in the WHOIS directory via SWIP or a distributed service 
> which meets the standards set forth in section 3.2.
>
> Second: Given your specific choice of A or B,  are you preferentially 
> inclined to choose the provided bit-boundary, or "/48"
>
> Third: If none of these options are palatable, do you have a proposed 
> approach?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Leif Sawyer
>
> Advisory Council
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170717/02e9fe90/attachment.htm>