[arin-ppml] ARIN Response to AFRINIC on Policy compatibility
Jose R. de la Cruz III
jrdelacruz at acm.org
Fri Jan 20 12:04:25 EST 2017
I agree with Bill. If they are yet to reach runout, why are "external"
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 7:24 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, David R Huberman <daveid at panix.com>
> > Last week, ARIN staff sent to this list a copy of their response to
> > on inter-RIR transfer policy compatability.
> > The AFRINIC community is considering a one-way transfer policy as a
> > bootstrap for the few years until they reach IPv4 runout, at which point
> > would aim to become two-way.
> Hi David,
> If AFRINIC hasn't reached IPv4 runout, why do their registrants need
> to buy addresses in the ARIN region?
> I consider reciprocity far more important than needs testing. The LIR
> loophole APNIC registrants continue to abuse bothers me.
> Bill Herrin
> William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
> Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML