[arin-ppml] ARIN Response to AFRINIC on Policy compatibility

[Jose R. de la Cruz III]

I agree with Bill. If they are yet to reach runout, why are "external"
resources required?

José

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 7:24 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, David R Huberman <daveid at panix.com>
> wrote:
> > Last week, ARIN staff sent to this list a copy of their response to
> AFRINIC
> > on inter-RIR transfer policy compatability.
> >
> > The AFRINIC community is considering a one-way transfer policy as a
> > bootstrap for the few years until they reach IPv4 runout, at which point
> it
> > would aim to become two-way.
>
> Hi David,
>
> If AFRINIC hasn't reached IPv4 runout, why do their registrants need
> to buy addresses in the ARIN region?
>
> I consider reciprocity far more important than needs testing. The LIR
> loophole APNIC registrants continue to abuse bothers me.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
>
> --
> William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
> Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170120/51e234c7/attachment.htm>