[arin-ppml] Revisit RPKI TAL Relying Party Agreement?
owen at delong.com
Fri Feb 3 17:23:53 EST 2017
> On Feb 3, 2017, at 07:47 , William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:
>> Please keep in mind that this thread was about removing barriers, to
>> enable RPKI innovation.
> Hi folks,
> Is ARIN the right place for an RPKI registry? They seem... reluctant.
> It's not just the data for relying parties; they won't publish RPKI
> information for the legacy registrants without those registrants first
> entering contractual relationships unrelated to RPKI.
> Classically ARIN has had a minimalist role in routing policy
> decisions. This has been considered a good thing. Fundamentally, RPKI
> is routing policy. Maybe another organization should be created to
> manage RPKI in North America, one which doesn't suffer ARIN's mindset.
Since ARIN is the registry, there’s really no other authoritative source
for the information.
As such, nobody else is in a proper position to certify the resource holdings.
More information about the ARIN-PPML