[arin-ppml] Revisit RPKI TAL Relying Party Agreement?
bill at herrin.us
Fri Feb 3 14:25:45 EST 2017
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 2:20 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2017, at 12:29 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>> As you are aware, we provide legacy resource holders the same registry
>>> services (including ability to update Whois contact info, reverse DNS, etc.)
>>> that they received at ARIN’s formation, and that is done no charge and with
>>> no requirement for any agreement.
>> Exactly. You refuse to provide new services related to legacy resource
>> holdings, including RPKI. While not unreasonable in the context of
>> ARIN operations, this is harmful to the RPKI efforts.
> To be clear, we offer all registry services to all resources holders under the
> same terms, but I do agree that having a segment of resource holders that
> do not wish to participate in the ARIN community nor support it financially
> does detract somewhat from community initiatives such as RPKI. This
> is unfortunate, but seems to slowly diminishing over time via both IPv4
> transfers and IPv6 deployment.
Respectfully, the all-or-nothing requirement isn't something
mysteriously and unfortunately happening to you. ARIN is the cause.
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
More information about the ARIN-PPML