[arin-ppml] Revisit RPKI TAL Relying Party Agreement?
jcurran at arin.net
Fri Feb 3 11:13:15 EST 2017
On 3 Feb 2017, at 10:47 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> Is ARIN the right place for an RPKI registry? They seem... reluctant.
ARIN is actually quite active in development, promotion, and support
of RPKI services – please do not confuse having appropriate legal
agreements with level of enthusiasm...
> It's not just the data for relying parties; they won't publish RPKI
> information for the legacy registrants without those registrants first
> entering contractual relationships unrelated to RPKI.
As you are aware, we provide legacy resource holders the same registry
services (including ability to update Whois contact info, reverse DNS, etc.)
that they received at ARIN’s formation, and that is done no charge and with
no requirement for any agreement. Resource holders who want newer
services paid for by the community are expected join and pay the same
fees as others in that community.
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML