[arin-ppml] Revisit RPKI TAL Relying Party Agreement?
bill at herrin.us
Fri Feb 3 10:47:10 EST 2017
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:
> Please keep in mind that this thread was about removing barriers, to
> enable RPKI innovation.
Is ARIN the right place for an RPKI registry? They seem... reluctant.
It's not just the data for relying parties; they won't publish RPKI
information for the legacy registrants without those registrants first
entering contractual relationships unrelated to RPKI.
Classically ARIN has had a minimalist role in routing policy
decisions. This has been considered a good thing. Fundamentally, RPKI
is routing policy. Maybe another organization should be created to
manage RPKI in North America, one which doesn't suffer ARIN's mindset.
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
More information about the ARIN-PPML