[arin-ppml] 2016-3 Revisited

David Huberman daveid at panix.com
Fri Feb 3 10:43:00 EST 2017


Mike,

I buy a /13. I abuse the spirit of 2016-3, meant for smaller transfers as our first attempt at no needs testing, by reiterating /16 transfers one after the other.

Market pricing doesn't stop this, and the ARIN community who participates in public policy matters has made it clear that an incremental approach towards needs testing is a good thing.

David

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 10:34 AM, Mike Burns <mike at iptrading.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> If that approach still doesn't work can you suggest some other mechanism to prevent abuse that does not prevent an organization who needs IP space from using this policy?  
>  
>  
> Hi Jason,
>  
> Why are we ignoring the mechanism that prevents organizations from buying un-needed anything? To wit, they have to pay money for these addresses. You guys are spinning up unlikely scenarios and ignoring the 800lb. elephant in the room… the cost of these addresses is the mechanism you seek. 
>  
> Regards,
> Mike
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20170203/5c01b459/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list