[arin-ppml] 2016-3 Revisited

[Owen DeLong]

Simple to resolve for the 6-month horizon —

… Such that no more than a total of a /16 equivalent may be transferred under these provisions within any 6 month period. …

Owen

> On Feb 3, 2017, at 07:19 , David R Huberman <daveid at panix.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> I thought of a possible problem with the anti-abuse language -- all versions of it.  Let me talk it out.
> 
> An organization has a /19.
> It has growing products, and wants another /19 for its 1 or 2 year need.
> It wants to avail itself of the new language.
> It is able to buy a /20 from Buyer A, and a /20 from Buyer B.
> 
> It closes the deal with Buyer A first, and transfers at ARIN using the proposed language.
> 
> How does it use any version we've discussed (Jason's various proposals, the current text, etc) to transfer the space it buys from Buyer B?
> 
> 
> (In all discussion, yes, you can always use the other sections of 8.5, but let's stick to the spirit of this policy language, which is meant to help smaller and mid-size networks double their holdings without needs testing.)
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.