[arin-ppml] 2016-3 Revisited

[David R Huberman]

I thought of a possible problem with the anti-abuse language -- all 
versions of it.  Let me talk it out.

An organization has a /19.
It has growing products, and wants another /19 for its 1 or 2 year need.
It wants to avail itself of the new language.
It is able to buy a /20 from Buyer A, and a /20 from Buyer B.

It closes the deal with Buyer A first, and transfers at ARIN using the 
proposed language.

How does it use any version we've discussed (Jason's various proposals, 
the current text, etc) to transfer the space it buys from Buyer B?


(In all discussion, yes, you can always use the other sections of 8.5, but 
let's stick to the spirit of this policy language, which is meant to help 
smaller and mid-size networks double their holdings without needs 
testing.)