[arin-ppml] re-org question

Scott Leibrand scott at dlvr.com
Mon Nov 7 14:07:36 EST 2016


The intent of this policy text was that an organization receiving a
sparsely used /16 would transfer the unused bits to other organization(s)
that could use them.  In your case, if you transferred all the /24s that
are currently unused (without any renumbering), would the blocks you're
keeping meet a 50% utilization threshold, if you include planned 24 month


On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:54 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:32 PM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> > However, I still need to know what you think of making the
> > transfer part explicitly voluntarily, would that eliminate your
> > worry about the current language?
> Hi David,
> I think "voluntary" in that context sounds a lot like "voluntold." So
> no, it does not resolve my concern.
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
> --
> William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
> Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20161107/9f359bfc/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list