[arin-ppml] re-org question
scott at dlvr.com
Mon Nov 7 14:07:36 EST 2016
The intent of this policy text was that an organization receiving a
sparsely used /16 would transfer the unused bits to other organization(s)
that could use them. In your case, if you transferred all the /24s that
are currently unused (without any renumbering), would the blocks you're
keeping meet a 50% utilization threshold, if you include planned 24 month
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:54 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:32 PM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> > However, I still need to know what you think of making the
> > transfer part explicitly voluntarily, would that eliminate your
> > worry about the current language?
> Hi David,
> I think "voluntary" in that context sounds a lot like "voluntold." So
> no, it does not resolve my concern.
> Bill Herrin
> William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
> Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML