[arin-ppml] re-org question

Dave Feuer dave at connetrix.com
Sat Nov 5 20:53:26 EDT 2016

Although I don't want to put words in people mouths. Off the top of my head

1) Equipment that is spread far and wide that needs to talk to other
equipment that is spread far and wide.
If every time you change an IP in 1 router you have to manually hit another
dozen it gets to be a disaster very quickly.

2) Legacy apps that have addresses hard coded in them.

3) Legacy hardware that has routes and addresses hard coded in them. 


-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 7:51 PM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] re-org question

In message
<F04ED1585899D842B482E7ADCA581B84593F397E at newserver.arneill-py.local>Michel
Py <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:

>Re-numbering is NOT an option regardless of the incentive.

I don't want to distract from the point you were making, but I wonder if you
might be so kind as to elaborate on the above assertion, e.g.
for the benefit of those few poor ignorant sods on this list, such as
myself, who might be largely or entirely ignorant of the issues and related

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public
Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list