[arin-ppml] re-org question

[Owen DeLong]

> On Nov 4, 2016, at 19:11 , William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> Perhaps, in part, because some of us think that the RSA is what is broken rather than the language in the policy.
> 
> Owen,
> 
> Really? You think ARIN policy should be that folks are required to
> renumber just because of a business transaction involving the owner of
> the physical network using them?

Nowhere does it say you are required to renumber. You’re reading that into things.

It says that if the combined organization can not justify the combined resources, that ARIN will work with them on appropriate transfers, and/or returns.

Renumbering is entirely optional, though may often be the simplest course.

> 'Cause if you don't think that then maybe let's get that stray
> sentence the heck out of there.

Please point me to the stray sentence about renumbering first.

I’m just not seeing it in the policy.

Owen