[arin-ppml] LAST CALL for Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2016-4: Transfers for new entrants

[Brian Jones]

Support.

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:57 PM Chris Woodfield <chris at semihuman.com> wrote:

> Support as proposed.
>
> -C
>
> > On Oct 26, 2016, at 2:17 PM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
> >
> > The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 21 October 2016 and decided to
> send Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2016-4: Transfers for new entrants to
> Last Call:
> >
> > The AC provided the following statement to the community:
> >
> > This proposal is technically sound and enables fair and impartial number
> policy. There is support for this policy in the ARIN community as expressed
> at ARIN 38 and on PPML. There has been no opposition stated to 2016-4. At
> the ARIN AC meeting held on 10/21/2016, it was agreed that in the "Anything
> else" section of Recommended Draft Policy 2016-4 stating that 'The text in
> 4.2.2 “for specified transfers, or three months otherwise” and the text in
> 4.3.3 “for specified transfers, or 12 months otherwise” should be stricken
> if ARIN-prop-227 is adopted' should be followed by ARIN staff as an
> instruction from the AC, presuming that 2016-2 (which is what ARIN-prop-227
> has become) continues to move forward after last call.
> >
> > Feedback is encouraged during the Last Call period. All comments should
> be provided to the Public Policy Mailing List. This Last Call will expire
> on 9 November 2016. After Last Call, the AC will conduct their Last Call
> review.
> >
> > The full text is below and available at:
> > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/
> >
> > The ARIN Policy Development Process is available at:
> > https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Communications and Member Services
> > American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ARIN-2016-4: Transfers for new entrants
> >
> > AC assessment of conformance with the Principles of Internet Number
> Resource Policy:
> >
> > The proposal is technically sound and enables fair and impartial number
> policy by ensuring that new organizations have a mechanism to access at
> least a minimum amount of resources from the transfer market. The staff and
> legal review (as updated 8/19/2016) is non-controversial. There is support
> and no concerns have been raised by the community regarding the proposal on
> PPML or elsewhere.
> >
> > Problem Statement:
> >
> > New organizations without existing IPv4 space may not always be able to
> qualify for an initial allocation under NRPM 4.2, particularly if they are
> categorized as ISPs and subject to 4.2.2.1.1. Use of /24. Now that ARIN’s
> free pool is exhausted, 4.2.1.6. Immediate need states that “These cases
> are exceptional”, but that is no longer correct. End user organizations
> requiring less a /24 of address space may also be unable to acquire space
> from their upstream ISP, and may instead need to receive a /24 from ARIN
> via transfer.
> >
> > Policy statement:
> >
> > Replace Section 4.2.2 with:
> >
> > 4.2.2. Initial allocation to ISPs
> >
> > “All ISP organizations without direct assignments or allocations from
> ARIN qualify for an initial allocation of up to a /21, subject to ARIN’s
> minimum allocation size. Organizations may qualify for a larger initial
> allocation by documenting how the requested allocation will be utilized
> within 24 months for specified transfers, or three months otherwise. ISPs
> renumbering out of their previous address space will be given a reasonable
> amount of time to do so, and any blocks they are returning will not count
> against their utilization.
> >
> > Replace Section 4.3.2 to read:
> >
> > 4.3.2 Minimum assignment
> >
> > ARIN’s minimum assignment for end-user organizations is a /24.
> >
> > End-user organizations without direct assignments or allocations from
> ARIN qualify for an initial assignment of ARIN’s minimum assignment size.
> >
> > Replace the first two sentences of Section 4.3.3. Utilization rate to
> read:
> >
> > Organizations may qualify for a larger initial allocation by providing
> appropriate details to verify their 24-month growth projection for
> specified transfers, or 12 months otherwise.
> >
> > Resulting new section 4.3.3 will be:
> >
> > Organizations may qualify for a larger initial allocation, by providing
> appropriate details to verify their 24-month growth projection for
> specified transfers, or 12 months otherwise.
> >
> > The basic criterion that must be met is a 50% utilization rate within
> one year.
> >
> > A greater utilization rate may be required based on individual network
> requirements.
> >
> > Comments:
> >
> > Timetable for implementation: Immediate
> >
> > Anything else
> >
> > The text in 4.2.2 “for specified transfers, or three months otherwise”
> and the text in 4.3.3 “for specified transfers, or 12 months otherwise”
> should be stricken if ARIN-prop-227 is adopted.
> > _______________________________________________
> > PPML
> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20161102/5aabc085/attachment.htm>