[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2016-3 Alternative simplified criteria for justifying small IPv4 transfers
owen at delong.com
Wed May 25 10:41:42 EDT 2016
> Some questions:
> 1. What is the "right" value for the cap?
> (/12, /16, something else?)
I support /16
> 2. Would you support this proposal if the cap was the "right" value?
> 3. Would you support this proposal if the cap was the "wrong" value?
> (if the right value is /12, would you support /16?
> if the right value is /16, would you support /12?
> if the right value is something else would you support /12 and/or /16?)
I will not support if the cap is more than 65,536 addresses. I will support longer than /16 if the community chooses to go in that direction, but I believe that /16 provides adequate protection.
More information about the ARIN-PPML