[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2016-5: Post-IPv4-Free-Pool-Depletion Transfer Policy
matthew at matthew.at
Fri Jun 24 16:37:36 EDT 2016
From: "Matthew Wilder" <Matthew.Wilder at telus.com>:
>It's probably a good time to stop the Titanic reference. Sure IPv6
>deployment has reached 12% globally, but my most optimistic projections
>show that IPv4 is going to be relevant for a half decade more from now.
> I think the Titanic sunk in less time if I'm not mistaken.
Only because we're all here talking about IPv4 policy instead of
>Transfer policies are going to be the most stable source of IPv4
>addresses post-depletion so it does make good sense to have good
>policies for those organizations who need it.
Organizations who need it are arguably doing something wrong. Why should
we have policies any better/different than the existing ones? More
importantly, why is changing the policies we have now a good use of
More information about the ARIN-PPML