[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2016-4: Transfers for new entrants

Brian Jones bjones at vt.edu
Thu Jul 21 21:11:54 EDT 2016


Support.

On Jul 20, 2016 3:39 PM, "John Springer" <3johnl at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear PPML,
>
> ARIN-2016-4 was accepted as a Draft Policy in June.
>
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2016_4.html
>
> Expressions of support or opposition to the DP are solicited to assist in
> evaluating what to do with it in the run up to the meeting in Dallas.
>
> At the moment, it appears technically sound and fair to me, but
> expressions of support will be required to advance.
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> John Springer
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 8:40 AM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
>
>> On 16 June 2016 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) advanced the following
>> Proposal to Draft Policy status:
>>
>> ARIN-prop-229: Transfers for new entrants
>>
>> This Draft Policy has been numbered and titled:
>>
>> Draft Policy ARIN-2016-4: Transfers for new entrants
>>
>> Draft Policy ARIN-2016-4 is below and can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2016_4.html
>>
>> You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will
>> evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft
>> policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated
>> in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:
>>
>>  * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
>>  * Technically Sound
>>  * Supported by the Community
>>
>> The PDP can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>>
>> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
>> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Communications and Member Services
>> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>>
>> ##########
>>
>> Draft Policy ARIN-2016-4: Transfers for new entrants
>>
>> Date: 21 June, 2016
>> Problem Statement:
>>
>> New organizations without existing IPv4 space may not always be able to
>> qualify for an initial allocation under NRPM 4.2, particularly if they are
>> categorized as ISPs and subject to 4.2.2.1.1. Use of /24. Now that ARIN's
>> free pool is exhausted, 4.2.1.6. Immediate need states that "These cases
>> are exceptional", but that is no longer correct. End user organizations
>> requiring less a /24 of address space may also be unable to acquire space
>> from their upstream ISP, and may instead need to receive a /24 from ARIN
>> via transfer.
>>
>> Policy statement:
>>
>> Replace Section 4.2.2 with:
>>
>> 4.2.2. Initial allocation to ISPs
>>
>> "All ISP organizations without direct assignments or allocations from
>> ARIN qualify for an initial allocation of up to a /21, subject to ARIN's
>> minimum allocation size. Organizations may qualify for a larger initial
>> allocation by documenting how the requested allocation will be utilized
>> within 24 months for specified transfers, or three months otherwise. ISPs
>> renumbering out of their previous address space will be given a reasonable
>> amount of time to do so, and any blocks they are returning will not count
>> against their utilization.
>>
>> Replace Section 4.3.2 to read:
>>
>> 4.3.2 Minimum assignment
>>
>> ARIN's minimum assignment for end-user organizations is a /24.
>>
>> End-user organizations without direct assignments or allocations from
>> ARIN qualify for an initial assignment of ARIN's minimum assignment size.
>>
>> Replace the first two sentences of Section 4.3.3. Utilization rate to
>> read:
>>
>> Organizations may qualify for a larger initial allocation by providing
>> appropriate details to verify their 24-month growth projection for
>> specified transfers, or 12 months otherwise.
>>
>> Resulting new section 4.3.3 will be:
>>
>> Organizations may qualify for a larger initial allocation, by providing
>> appropriate details to verify their 24-month growth projection for
>> specified transfers, or 12 months otherwise.
>>
>> The basic criterion that must be met is a 50% utilization rate within one
>> year.
>>
>> A greater utilization rate may be required based on individual network
>> requirements. Please refer to RFC 2050 for more information on utilization
>> guidelines.
>>
>> Comments:
>>
>> Timetable for implementation: Immediate
>>
>> Anything else
>>
>> The text in 4.2.2 "for specified transfers, or three months otherwise"
>> and the text in 4.3.3 "for specified transfers, or 12 months otherwise"
>> should be stricken if ARIN-prop-227 is adopted.
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20160721/72781c9f/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list