[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2016-8: Removal of Indirect POC Validation Requirement

[Roberts, Orin (9012390)]

Really, this is why ARIN wants to rewrite a policy???

> that POC validation to reassignments 
> causes tremendous work for the staff. It receives many angry phone 
> calls and emails about the POC validation process.


This discussion should be focused on how to legally enforce indirect POC validation.
And what "tremendous work"; a bot/script can send those emails based on a template. The response from the POC can also be automated.

So the only valid discussion should be how to define a business relationship with indirect POCs to avoid the validation email being labelled spam.


~Orin

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ARIN-PPML [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: December-21-16 10:07 AM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2016-8: Removal of Indirect POC Validation Requirement

On 12/20/16 10:09 AM, ARIN wrote:
>
> 2) ARIN has previously reported that POC validation to reassignments 
> causes tremendous work for the staff. It receives many angry phone 
> calls and emails about the POC validation process. I believe the ARIN 
> staff should be focused on POC validation efforts for directly issued 
> resources, as that has more value to internet operations and law 
> enforcement than end-user POC information.


A detective that called me several weeks ago about a reassignment certainly did care, so this statement is inaccurate IMO.

~Seth
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.