[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks

[Matthew Petach]

I am OPPOSED to the proposal as written;
I think it's a bridge too far.  I would instead
support a compromise as has been discussed
of a total of one /22 per year per org-ID transferrable
needs-free; I would recommend the hold period
be two years from transfer date (ie, you may not
transfer that block of addresses again for 24
months so long as you remain a solvent
business entity; if you become insolvent,
ARIN can arm wrestle with the court over
control of the number resource).  Any
transfer larger than a /22 would still be
subject to need analysis.

Matt


On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Dani Roisman <droisman at softlayer.com> wrote:
> | Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:53:59 -0400
> | From: ARIN <info at arin.net>
> | To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> | Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9: Eliminating needs-based
> |       evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks
> | Message-ID: <56031167.1010007 at arin.net>
> | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> |
> | Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9
> | Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4
> | transfers of IPv4 netblocks
> |
> | On 17 September 2015 the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
> | "ARIN-prop-223 Eliminating needs-based evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3,
> | and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 netblocks" as a Draft Policy.
> |
> | Draft Policy ARIN-2015-9 is below and can be found at:
> | https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2015_9.html
>
> Greetings,
>
> There has been some stimulating dialog about the merits of 2015-9.  I'd like to ask that in addition to any overall support or lack thereof, you also review the policy language and comment specifically on the changes proposed:
> a) For those of you generally in support of this effort, are there any refinements to the changes made which you think will improve this should these policy changes be implemented?
> b) For those of you generally opposed to this effort, are there any adjustments to the policy changes which, if implemented, would gain your support?
>
> --
> Dani Roisman
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>