[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-10: Minimum IPv6 Assignments

[John Springer]

Hi Owen,

On Thu, 24 Sep 2015, Owen DeLong wrote:

>
>> On Sep 24, 2015, at 12:37 , John Springer <springer at inlandnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> And if you have an opinion of no, are you able to say because it is technically unsound or unfair and partial?
>
> This isn?t really necessary, John. A proposal must be fair, technically sound, and have support of the community in order to be adopted.
>
> Just because it is technically sound and/or fair does not mean that the community must support it.
>
> People are free to reject a policy for any reason, though I admit a bias in favor of at least some rationale for rejection.
>
> Owen
>

Oh, I think it is necessary for the community to comment on all three 
criteria, Owen, and I thank you for inviting them to express support or 
opposition.

BTW, do you support or oppose the Draft Policy?

John Springer