[arin-ppml] Transition /10
Morizot Timothy S
Timothy.S.Morizot at irs.gov
Tue Oct 20 11:09:45 EDT 2015
A description of the problem the change is intended to address would also be helpful to provide better context.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Hadenfeldt, Andrew C
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:06 AM
To: Martin Hannigan; arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Transition /10
I’m missing some context… RFC6598 (100.64.0.0/10)?
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Martin Hannigan
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 9:57 AM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net<mailto:arin-ppml at arin.net>
Subject: [arin-ppml] Transition /10
Any reason why at this point we shouldn't transition the transition /10 to a last /N like policy to more align with others? It does seem to be reasonable and fair. It seems like it was a mistake to not set aside the /8.
This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message and any attachments.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML