[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-2: Modify 8.4 (Inter-RIR Transfers to Specified Recipients)

[Ted Mittelstaedt]

How about we permit it only to orgs that can demonstrate the existence 
and adherence to an IPv6 migration plan?

Ted

On 5/28/2015 5:27 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Or simply not permit it under ARIN policy until such exists.
>
> Owen
>
>> On May 28, 2015, at 1:49 PM, John Curran<jcurran at arin.net>  wrote:
>>
>> On May 27, 2015, at 11:39 PM, Owen DeLong<owen at delong.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> My suggestion is that I don't mind (virtually) unrestricted moves of addresses to different regions staying with the same organization. However, if we are to allow that, I want us to find a way that you can't merely use that as a way to move addresses out of flip protection to then flip them to another organization via an RIR with a less restrictive transfer policy.
>>>
>>> So... If you transfer addresses to another region, keeping them in the same organization, no penalty. However, you are not allowed to subsequently transfer them (or other addresses in that region) to an external party for at least 12 months.
>>
>> That second portion that you seek would affect the ongoing operation of
>> another RIR, i.e. it requires them having some explicit policy to that effect.
>>
>> To obtain the result you seek, we either need globally coordinated transfer
>> policy in this area, or you need to make the inter-RIR transfer policy explicit
>> in this regard in determination of compatibility.
>>
>> /John
>>
>> John Curran
>> President and CEO
>> ARIN
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.