[arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments
bill at herrin.us
Fri Jun 26 18:22:29 EDT 2015
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
> As shepherd, I would be inclined to revise the policy statement so that it
> inserts e) and renumbers the current e) to f), rather than replacing the
> entire section as currently worded. Basically that would just mean
> promoting "b. General Comments:" to become the policy text.
> Bill, would that be sufficient for you, given the desire (for clarity) to
> have all the explicit cases listed first and the catchall at the end?
I think there's sound reasoning for the catchall to come last. Maybe
ask staff for advice? Reordering is generally a bad thing for this
sort of document, but every rule has its exceptions. If staff concurs
that reordering here is the optimal choice, I'd be satisfied.
Maybe there's a third way we're not seeing, like retiring e, adding
the new element as f, and then re-inserting the catchall some other
way, point g or as a sentence that follows the ordered list.
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
More information about the ARIN-PPML