[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6: Transfers and Multi-national Networks

Matthew Kaufman matthew at matthew.at
Tue Jun 23 20:36:53 EDT 2015

I think I'd be ok with that... do we need language in one or the other 
that explains what happens if both pass?

Matthew Kaufman
matthew at matthew.at

On 6/23/2015 5:21 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I agree with your reasoning, but as a conclusion, I support the broader-based 2015-5 as I believe it provides a more flexible solution to a wider swath of the ARIN community.
> Owen
>> On Jun 23, 2015, at 17:19 , Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
>> On 6/23/2015 1:06 PM, ARIN wrote:
>>> Draft Policy ARIN-2015-6
>>> Transfers and Multi-national Networks
>> I support this policy. For whatever reason, an entity may choose to be utilizing its address space anywhere in the world. Where the addresses are being used at this instant should not have any bearing on whether or not they are "utilized". Clearly if I have a /24 filled to 95% capacity with running VMs, and they're running on physical hardware in Virginia, that /24 is utilized. If I happen to choose later today to move them to a physical host in Luxembourg, the addresses didn't stop being utilized... they're just temporarily being used somewhere else in the world, and that's perfectly reasonable.
>> Further, keeping restrictions like this will simply cause entities to work around the policy either by using subsidiaries or by not even bothering to record transfers.
>> Matthew Kaufman
>> matthew at matthew.at
>> _______________________________________________
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list