[arin-ppml] On USG 'granting of rights' (was: ARIN-PPML 2015-2)
mike at iptrading.com
Wed Jun 3 14:26:55 EDT 2015
> Indeed ARIN appears to have sought every other avenue in which each
> case could be concluded without a judge having to reach the property question.
That is also incorrect.
Well, I remember the Microsoft/Nortel sale of all-legacy addresses allocated to defunct entities being sold in a bankruptcy court with no mention of ARIN.
In a court where the judge found that Nortel had the exclusive right to transfer the addresses before bidding began.
And I remember ARIN engaging in secret negotiations with Microsoft in the 30 days it had before the judge finalized his order, and allowing it to sign a modified Legacy Services Agreement when policy required an RSA.
And I remember ARIN scurrying in that 30 days to find that Microsoft apparently had a justified need for precisely the number of ip addresses allocated to a motley crew of companies acquired by Nortel in the 1990s.
And language about requirements designed with aggregation in mind, which required a single block transfer, were ignored.
Instead of letting the judge finalize his order as it was written.
To me that is evidence of what Bill is saying.
More information about the ARIN-PPML