[arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

[ggiesen+arin-ppml at giesen.me]

I presume that was in jest, but just like to confirm if you have a
legitimate beef with this draft policy.

Cheers,

GTG

-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Matthew Kaufman
Sent: June-23-15 8:25 PM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1: Modification
to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments

On 6/23/2015 1:07 PM, ARIN wrote:
> Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2015-1
> Modification to Criteria for IPv6 Initial End-User Assignments
>

I am of mixed opinion on this policy. I agree that it should be quite easy
for an organization to receive their own IPv6 space. And I was fully
supportive until I got to "many smaller enterprises are unlikely to adopt
IPv6 (currently perceived as an already tenuous proposition for most users
given current cost/benefit)". Since there's still major barriers to
deploying IPv6, despite this being over a decade since it should have
happened, the amount of popcorn I am able to consume as an observer over the
next few years if smaller enterprises find even more reasons to not adopt v6
(such as the one this policy wishes to correct) is vastly increased. I like
popcorn, and so I'm opposed on that basis alone.

Matthew Kaufman
matthew at eeph.com
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public
Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.